Article content material

Let’s fake you see a newspaper advert for presidency grants. The federal authorities is providing $30,000 for those who merely conform to be a pleasant individual. You make the applying and, voila, you’re accredited. The $30,000 seems electronically in your checking account. Is that quantity taxable? Greater than seemingly, it’s beneath present Revenue Tax Act legal guidelines.

In case your marginal private tax charge is, say, 35 per cent, you’ll find yourself with $19,500 after tax. Nonetheless, not a nasty deal for merely being a pleasant individual.

Article content material

Article content material

However what if Ottawa granted you a particular exemption from the relevant provisions of the act to take away the taxation on the $30,000? Alternatively, it may provide you with $46,500 and tax it again on the similar 35 per cent marginal private charge to make sure you obtain $30,000. Both manner, the federal government is providing you with each $30,000 of “free” cash and particular tax therapy.

Should you assume the above is a fairy story, it’s a actuality for politically linked firms. The above story is sort of bang on what occurred with subsidies given to Volkswagen AG and Stellantis NV to construct manufacturing crops to supply electric-vehicle batteries.

Right here’s the fairy-tale-to-policy-reality story. Final summer season and fall, the federal authorities introduced subsidies of greater than $30 billion for VW and Stellantis. However the authorities had additionally negotiated with them to make such subsidies free from company tax by altering Canada’s present legal guidelines. And earlier this month, that’s precisely what occurred.

To get to that very same consequence, the federal government may have merely grossed up the subsidies to the quantity that may internet VW and Stellantis the identical roughly $30 billion after tax, however that’s not what occurred right here.

Article content material

Article content material

Usually, such a change in tax regulation would want Parliamentary approval by bringing a invoice to the Home of Commons to be debated and ratified. However this specific change was accomplished with out a new invoice delivered to Parliament resulting from a quirk in how sure particular quantities/points can get carried out beneath the act. After all, any such course of when altering tax regulation is much less seen (and faster) than a invoice showing earlier than Parliament that may at the very least be debated.

If we assume the federal company tax charge is 15 per cent and the Ontario (the house of the brand new crops) charge is 11.5 per cent for a mixed charge of 26.5 per cent, which means the governments have foregone nearly $8 billion in tax income (assuming Ontario follows swimsuit, which it could not).

But it surely will get much more attention-grabbing. Within the 2021 federal funds, the federal government introduced that “inexperienced manufacturing” firms’ income could be topic to solely half the traditional federal company tax charges. The provinces didn’t comply with the federal lead of this proposal. I used to be a part of a small group of tax practitioners that opposed such a transfer, however, after all, such opposition fell on deaf ears since good politics is all the time extra highly effective than sound coverage.

Article content material

Given the ensuing federal tax charge bonanza, VW and Stellantis (assuming the subsidy quantities can be topic to these decrease charges) would have paid considerably lower than $8 billion in tax on the $30 billion in subsidies.

However now the federal authorities has gone one step additional and made the $30 billion of subsidies fully tax free. The Parliamentary Finances Officer (PBO) estimated the foregone tax income to be $5.8 billion utilizing the halved federal tax charge and relevant provincial charges.

Why would the federal authorities supply to make these subsidies tax free? Effectively, the federal government was apparently involved concerning the subsidy/tax-credit competitors from the USA. With out making the subsidies tax impartial, it could have made such subsidies much less engaging in comparison with the U.S. Let’s simply say I’m not shopping for this shallow logic and reasoning.

The easy arithmetic offered above don’t inform the entire story. To calculate the precise value of the subsidy grants is advanced, however the PBO has accomplished a superb job of offering estimates. As talked about above, the PBO estimates the foregone tax income to be $5.8 billion, however the general value of the subsidy handouts (together with one other $7 billion offered to Northvolt AB) to be roughly $44 billion.

Article content material

I’m guessing the above numbers are merely glossed over and rapidly dismissed by the typical Canadian, so let’s attempt to put that in a little bit of perspective. I’m no costing knowledgeable, however listed here are some fast examples of what $44 billion should buy as we speak:

• 587 faculties (assuming building value per college of $75 million);
• 22 hospitals (assuming building value per hospital of $2 billion);
• 11,000 kilometres of recent two-lane street building, or enough repairs of present roads (assuming building prices of $4 million per kilometre);
• 88,000 modest single-family properties (assuming a building value of $500,000 per house);
• 1,467,000 common households of 4 (that’s about 5.9 million folks) having their grocery payments paid for a complete 12 months (assuming a mean annual grocery invoice of $30,000 per household).

You see the purpose. The quantity of tax paid on cash earned by Canadians that’s then handed out on a tax-free foundation to VW and Stellantis is staggering. The funding earnings alone — assuming a 5 per cent charge of return on the funds — could be greater than $2 billion. Once more, sufficient to construct one other hospital, or one other 27 faculties.

Article content material

The shortage of transparency, the tax-free handouts and the greenback quantity that Canadian taxpayers are on the hook for is stunning and staggering.

Canadians have to be higher knowledgeable about how their tax {dollars} are being foolishly thrown away. The shortage of fiscal accountability in how special-interest fairy tales do come true for choose firms on the expense of taxpayers places all our futures in danger.

Kim Moody, FCPA, FCA, TEP, is the founding father of Moodys Tax/Moodys Non-public Consumer, a former chair of the Canadian Tax Basis, former chair of the Society of Property Practitioners (Canada) and has held many different management positions within the Canadian tax neighborhood. He will be reached at kgcm@kimgcmoody.com and his LinkedIn profile is www.linkedin.com/in/kimmoody.

Should you preferred this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.

Article content material